• RSS Recent Homologue posts

    • This site is no longer updated February 8, 2011
      This site is no longer updated. All existing and future homologue posts can be found at http://www.tamarinnorwood.co.uk/blog/
    • The body of the text #1 January 13, 2011
      We say: the writing of a text is its dying song.
    • The Third Bird January 9, 2011
      Here I am telling poems at the Icelandic Embassy. You can’t tell from the sound, but there’s a section where I wrote the words on paper as I recited them, dragging the line of text between opposite walls, carrying it through the air on a page of my notebook. I held the open notebook horizontally […]
    • Musica Practica at Tate Britain January 5, 2011
      Speaking of that Kaprow statement, my ongoing work Musica Practica is programmed for Tate Britain’s Late at Tate event in February. Moving the performance into a museum makes a change from its original South Bank location, where it took place both outdoors and outside of a designated art space. It meant people stumbled upon the […]
    • Allan Kaprow – Art as Life January 4, 2011
      “I’m put off by museums in general; they reek of a holy death which offends my sense of reality. … Moreover, apart from my personal view, most advanced art of the last half-dozen years is, in my view, inappropriate for Museum display. … Museums do more than isolate such work from life, they subtly sanctify […]
    • Hints & Tips Poster #6 December 18, 2010
    • A LINE IS A LINE FOR ALL THAT December 10, 2010
      Andrew Graham-Dixon: Tell me why this is a drawing.  Why is it a drawing and not a text? Lawrence Weiner: Oh, using text for drawing is no problem.  It tells you something.  But drawing is explicit.  Drawing is not implicit; there’s nothing hidden in a drawing.  When you draw for people, you’re drawing something to […]
    • As you work they leave December 6, 2010
      Other people in three studios: “‘You know,’ Cage reportedly said, ‘when you enter your studio, everyone is there, the people in your life, other artists, the old masters, everyone. And as you work they leave, one by one. And if it is a really good working day, well, you leave too.'” (Robert Storr, pp. 59-60) […]
    • Reviews and Tights December 1, 2010
      I’ve just spotted online the Jolly (Good) Show review I wrote for a-n. It opens: “People don’t like it when you get your shoes lost under the desk and you slope around the office in your tights. It’s not professional.” It occurs to me this is the second review I’ve written involving tights. The other […]
    • Shoes December 1, 2010
      I like this a great deal. (shoe by Tag Savage)

Repetition and Repetition at The Approach

Peter Dreher and Stuart Cumberland both had solo exhibitions at The Approach this summer. Both were painting shows that focussed on variations among repeated instances of the same fairly straightforward representational image. The formal similarities pretty much stop there – the paintings themselves, and the projects they’re part of, are very different indeed – but I can’t ignore the cumulative fact of their repetition.

Stuart Cumberland

Cumberland’s paintings look good. The best ones are bright green and brave, with brushwork that’s succulent and brash. And they’re of bottles of Champagne. One is of a bottle of Champagne with a cartoon foot in it. It looks like Cumberland’s been trying things out, one after the other, and I like the feeling that none of them quite did the trick so he had to keep starting new ones. But repeated over and over again with a stencilled outline, the image becomes more of a motif or a mantra than a statement of its own, and the statement you’re left with is the bald fact of repetition: no longer ‘here is this’, but ‘this is here many times over’. And so for all the vocal strength of Cumberland’s works, they stay immensely quiet.

Quietness is abundant in Peter Dreher’s project Tag um Tag ist guter Tag (Day by Day is a Good Day), an ongoing series of over four thousand near-identical paintings of the same glass in the same place. An earnest, quotidian study, at once exhaustive and hopelessly incomplete. Only a couple of dozen fitted onto the walls at the Approach in the summer, where the scale of the project was amplified by the immense absence of almost all of it.

Peter Dreher, Tag um Tag ist guter Tag (2176)

Reiteration comes up a lot in my own practice because I work with translation, and I’ve found there’s something about translated texts that makes them resist being read. The meaning resides somewhere other than in the artefact you have in front of you. Translations enact frustration – they’re just off the tip of your tongue, or floating an inch from the surface of the page – and they excite the impulse to go back to the original and compare the two.

And just as a translation can never shake its original, so a repeated image can never stand on its own without recourse to its brothers. The Dreher exhibition is a quiet exercise in resistance. Even as you minutely watch the details of one canvas something is tearing you away, to look at the next one, or to stand back and survey them all at once. The possibility of such recourse is thwarted not only by their number but by the fact that most of their number aren’t even in the country – they’re on show elsewhere, or stacked up in the artist’s studio. The whole work is inaccessible; the work is wholly inaccessible; and this is all we can get at: it is the whole work.

So what are we left with, when our only access to the work is truncated, or whispered, or under erasure? We fall through. As each separate utterance of the physical thing is quietened we’re left with the space in between the words: the matrix-stuff that joins them. Cumberland’s Congratulations anthropomorphises the floating space in between, with some frustrated artist-persona springing to the fore, stuck making the same thing over and over again with a fervour that steals the limelight from the paintings themselves. But Dreher is private, and smooths himself out of his work. What he leaves behind is the cancellation of the project entirely; the pulse of insistent indecision; an anti-manifesto.

Tamarin Norwood

3 Responses

  1. […] of the quietness I felt each painting intended. Though I’m reminded of Peter Dreher’s Tag um Tag ist guter Tag paintings, whose tireless repetition is specifically the element that allows them to stay quiet and […]

  2. […] springing to mind as I’ve been writing – it seems to come to similar conclusions. It’s here on Kultur […]

  3. […] in art. It builds on a review I wrote of Peter Dreher’s 2007 Approach exhibition on the Kultur Fabric blog. I’m thinking about Dreher’s work again today in terms of the ‘event’ in […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: