• RSS Recent Homologue posts

    • This site is no longer updated February 8, 2011
      This site is no longer updated. All existing and future homologue posts can be found at http://www.tamarinnorwood.co.uk/blog/
    • The body of the text #1 January 13, 2011
      We say: the writing of a text is its dying song.
    • The Third Bird January 9, 2011
      Here I am telling poems at the Icelandic Embassy. You can’t tell from the sound, but there’s a section where I wrote the words on paper as I recited them, dragging the line of text between opposite walls, carrying it through the air on a page of my notebook. I held the open notebook horizontally […]
    • Musica Practica at Tate Britain January 5, 2011
      Speaking of that Kaprow statement, my ongoing work Musica Practica is programmed for Tate Britain’s Late at Tate event in February. Moving the performance into a museum makes a change from its original South Bank location, where it took place both outdoors and outside of a designated art space. It meant people stumbled upon the […]
    • Allan Kaprow – Art as Life January 4, 2011
      “I’m put off by museums in general; they reek of a holy death which offends my sense of reality. … Moreover, apart from my personal view, most advanced art of the last half-dozen years is, in my view, inappropriate for Museum display. … Museums do more than isolate such work from life, they subtly sanctify […]
    • Hints & Tips Poster #6 December 18, 2010
    • A LINE IS A LINE FOR ALL THAT December 10, 2010
      Andrew Graham-Dixon: Tell me why this is a drawing.  Why is it a drawing and not a text? Lawrence Weiner: Oh, using text for drawing is no problem.  It tells you something.  But drawing is explicit.  Drawing is not implicit; there’s nothing hidden in a drawing.  When you draw for people, you’re drawing something to […]
    • As you work they leave December 6, 2010
      Other people in three studios: “‘You know,’ Cage reportedly said, ‘when you enter your studio, everyone is there, the people in your life, other artists, the old masters, everyone. And as you work they leave, one by one. And if it is a really good working day, well, you leave too.'” (Robert Storr, pp. 59-60) […]
    • Reviews and Tights December 1, 2010
      I’ve just spotted online the Jolly (Good) Show review I wrote for a-n. It opens: “People don’t like it when you get your shoes lost under the desk and you slope around the office in your tights. It’s not professional.” It occurs to me this is the second review I’ve written involving tights. The other […]
    • Shoes December 1, 2010
      I like this a great deal. (shoe by Tag Savage)

The Le Feuvre/Suchin standoff

Back in July this year Le Feuvre reviewed two publications associated with the Frieze and Zoo fairs in Art Monthly. She described art fairs as “no longer [being] simply about selling – they are about producing and critically engaging with culture”, and argued that “Frieze Projects make it possible to fill each day of the fair with activities that neatly bypass the endless stands of galleries selling their wares”.

Suchin responds with an out-and-out attack on the world of the art fair. Le Feuvre is wrong, he says, to argue “yes, there’s all that nasty commercial stuff at the fairs but, don’t worry, the really important work is high above all that” (his paraphrase). He insists “[a]rt fairs reduce complexity and diversity to sameness. They encourage vacuous glancing rather than extended consideration of art works, and they privilege marketing and money over artistic interests, conveying a status and importance to dealing, collecting and curating that these activities scarcely deserve.”

The power of the market is present at every juncture in the life-span of an artwork, argues Le Feuvre. But “to dismiss a possibility of critical art practice within this situation is to reject wholesale the notion that artistic practice and surrounding dialogues are capable of addressing these very forces that rightly need to be regarded with suspicion.” Robust artwork must be able to engage with the marketplace environment in which it inevitably (if regrettably) exists, and paradoxically the territory of the art fair is all the more innocuous because of its heavy-handedness – “propaganda should not look like propaganda if it is to be successful”.

“But neither all artists nor even all galleries are commercially minded,” returns Suchin, so artwork is not inevitably imbued with commercial culture. The fact that there are artists and galleries out there who operate outside “mercantilism” means it is possible, legitimate and necessary to step outside and critique the structure of the art fairs. In failing to do so Le Feuvre’s original review was “a model of avoidance of such question-raising, a smoke-screen obscuring some very deserving targets for critique”.

Sean Ashton intervenes to draw attention to the content of the actual publications Le Feuvre was reviewing in the first place, which he rightly argues have been rather sidestepped throughout the discussion. The association of The New Art with Zoo doesn’t necessarily make it propaganda, and the list of contributors with no connection to the fair should make it clear that “it is not the ‘promotional’ book that [Suchin’s] knee-jerk Marxist sensibility would like it to be”.

Suchin counters Ashton’s clarifications by citing Hans Haacke’s refusal to participate in art fairs at all. He asks why, when The New Art claims to be critically unbiased, does “the possibility of a Haacke-like blank refusal to be involved never even [come] up as a potential stance”? “It would be more honest,” he writes, “to admit to wanting a slice of the pie rather than feign acute critical independence or super-sly insubordination”. His conclusion: “If people didn’t confuse being seen in the ‘right’ places with being an artist (or a managerial variant thereof), the tedium implicit in the translation of art into business would be inversely echoed in the consequent decline of entrance ticket sales”.

Art Monthly have woven an event around the debate at the ICA next month.

Tamarin Norwood

One Response

  1. […] Featured Artists « The Le Feuvre/Suchin standoff […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: