• RSS Recent Homologue posts

    • This site is no longer updated February 8, 2011
      This site is no longer updated. All existing and future homologue posts can be found at http://www.tamarinnorwood.co.uk/blog/ Advertisements
    • The body of the text #1 January 13, 2011
      We say: the writing of a text is its dying song.
    • The Third Bird January 9, 2011
      Here I am telling poems at the Icelandic Embassy. You can’t tell from the sound, but there’s a section where I wrote the words on paper as I recited them, dragging the line of text between opposite walls, carrying it through the air on a page of my notebook. I held the open notebook horizontally […]
    • Musica Practica at Tate Britain January 5, 2011
      Speaking of that Kaprow statement, my ongoing work Musica Practica is programmed for Tate Britain’s Late at Tate event in February. Moving the performance into a museum makes a change from its original South Bank location, where it took place both outdoors and outside of a designated art space. It meant people stumbled upon the […]
    • Allan Kaprow – Art as Life January 4, 2011
      “I’m put off by museums in general; they reek of a holy death which offends my sense of reality. … Moreover, apart from my personal view, most advanced art of the last half-dozen years is, in my view, inappropriate for Museum display. … Museums do more than isolate such work from life, they subtly sanctify […]
    • Hints & Tips Poster #6 December 18, 2010
    • A LINE IS A LINE FOR ALL THAT December 10, 2010
      Andrew Graham-Dixon: Tell me why this is a drawing.  Why is it a drawing and not a text? Lawrence Weiner: Oh, using text for drawing is no problem.  It tells you something.  But drawing is explicit.  Drawing is not implicit; there’s nothing hidden in a drawing.  When you draw for people, you’re drawing something to […]
    • As you work they leave December 6, 2010
      Other people in three studios: “‘You know,’ Cage reportedly said, ‘when you enter your studio, everyone is there, the people in your life, other artists, the old masters, everyone. And as you work they leave, one by one. And if it is a really good working day, well, you leave too.'” (Robert Storr, pp. 59-60) […]
    • Reviews and Tights December 1, 2010
      I’ve just spotted online the Jolly (Good) Show review I wrote for a-n. It opens: “People don’t like it when you get your shoes lost under the desk and you slope around the office in your tights. It’s not professional.” It occurs to me this is the second review I’ve written involving tights. The other […]
    • Shoes December 1, 2010
      I like this a great deal. (shoe by Tag Savage)
  • Advertisements

Letting Go: CSM4+ Group Exhibition

Exhibition: Letting Go: CSM4+ Group
Waterloo Gallery, 14 Bayliss Road, 24-29 September

Keeping the momentum going after art school is no easy feat, but the artists showing at the Waterloo Gallery this week are giving it a very good go. Following the success of to take a-way (one) at the Liverpool Street Nolias Gallery, many of the same Central Saint Martins graduates have recreated the excitement two months down the line, along with fellow graduates of Chelsea College. The exhibition comprised objects, painting, photography, video and sound with no overriding theme or agenda, and I want to focus on what struck me as the bravest thing about the show: how so much of the work squared up and took on the space itself.

The Waterloo Gallery is a harder space to work with than the trendy, rough-edged Nolias, and a lot of the artwork tangles with the in-built corporate personality of the place, which wouldn’t look out of place as the lobby to a central London office complex. The artwork that excited me most of all played with things like the disproportionate glare of the staircase that takes centre stage as you walk in the door, the motley combination of walls in glass, plaster and brick, and the dodgy plastic picture rails the brickwork demands. It’s this kind of cooperation and inventiveness that characterised much of the work on show, and epitomises the sparks of playful ingenuity that abound when the group are on top form.

Jean Lyons

Three such sparks were dotted about in the ample space below the stairs: a TV monitor, a stack of plastic chairs and a structure of concrete, wood and glass that may or may not have been part of the staircase. It was a genuine delight to see that same stack of chairs turn up indifferently on the adjacent monitor during Sandra Wroe’s video Deal: an understated addendum that threw everything else around me out of step, and did away with any firm idea of what is and what isn’t up for consideration.

Along the same lines, over on the other side of the room Nathan Birchenough’s very small paper replica of a door flicked opened and closed in time with the occasional movements of adjacent real door nearby (although for all my kneeling on the floor I couldn’t work out what it did and Nathan had to come over and explain it to me by pointing at the wires). How it relates to the table and framed pig I’m not sure, but I don’t think I’m meant to be sure. The humour of the piece was in line with the spunky bravura of the show, as was its playful feeling of furtive resistance to the way things are.

Resisting the physicality of the place gave way to happy compromises: the awkward practicality of those white hanging rails was nicely brought up to speed in Visual Axis, Hindsight and Trophy (above): three interconnected works by Jean Lyons which mirror their hanging rail by marking out their own grid of white lines, to support what looked like solid analogies to the home-life of spectacles. The works had a quotidian honesty that translated convincingly to being gridded onto brickwork, and it was a fruitful intervention that I think did a lot for the work.

If I have one regret it’s the lack of unclassified, anonymous bits and pieces that I remember from the Nolias show, and, looking back, from the cluttered working studio many of the artists shared back at art school. There was a nod in that direction with the decision to number the works rather than name them, but this time round it felt a little half-hearted and less spontaneous, as though the show hadn’t been as much fun to put together. I wanted to see more work, to crowd the gallery and fill up the gaps so that everything encroached on everything else with that uneasy, productive feeling you get when you can’t quite tell what you’re looking at.

In this respect perhaps the most effective piece in the show was Jeremy Evans‘ sound piece work # 31 and: a CD player sitting in one corner halfway down the stairs with a sellotaped label (‘press play’). Inside the headphones the beat kicked in straight away, a low, groovy pulse, pregnant with space for accompaniment. As I listened and waited, and nothing changed, the perfect regularity of the single beat began to do something very good. It nudged through the spaces in the room to bind the show together so that the hang became a series of snapshot punches with every glimpse staple-gunned to the wall around me. Seeing the exhibition pinned up against some kind of dead-pan, linear time frame lent it a scrambled unity that sealed the show and recklessly set it going.

Tamarin Norwood


7 Responses

  1. I think my Reindeer was dancing to #31 and: … I like the title of Jeremy’s work because it forces me to write more. I agree, more unclassified bits and bobs next time! Maybe I should mention that the creature in the frame was a tapir not a pig, though the drawing was pretty bad so that’s not Tamarin’s fault.

  2. Thanks for the comment Nathan. Funny you should mention the reindeer because I was going to end with the idea that Jeremy’s time-line “sealed the show and set it going with the recklessness of a clockwork reindeer”. I shouldn’t have changed it! Those are the kinds of quiet relationships I really enjoyed about the show.

    Also I stand corrected about the tapir, sorry about that.

  3. The tapir doesn’t mind, he was flattered..

  4. Great to read your review – many thanks – it’s so good to have creative feedback.
    Will forward your email to others in the group.

  5. Glad you liked the chairs! Those Robin Day chairs keep turning up, and in fact belonged to the adjoining community hall! They were constantly being moved and tidied away, and sensibly used as coat stand/drinks table during the Private View! And you are so right, all those surfaces in one room, and the huge staircase that is in your face as you walk in. Thank you for your cohesive response!

  6. Thanks for your comments! Sandra it’s nice to hear you just found the stack of chairs next door and dragged them in – if they’d been a prop you’d placed in the video and then brought along for the show it would have been very different. What did you think of people putting stuff on them during the PV – did you want to keep taking it all off again or did it add to the video? And did the community hall mind you taking their chairs??

  7. It’s good people using them – quite like the semi-performative aspect of audience bussling around them – and maybe sitting on them – as long as they put them back on the stack! Community hall didn’t mind me taking them, as they have about 700 in there!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: