• RSS Recent Homologue posts

    • This site is no longer updated February 8, 2011
      This site is no longer updated. All existing and future homologue posts can be found at http://www.tamarinnorwood.co.uk/blog/ Advertisements
    • The body of the text #1 January 13, 2011
      We say: the writing of a text is its dying song.
    • The Third Bird January 9, 2011
      Here I am telling poems at the Icelandic Embassy. You can’t tell from the sound, but there’s a section where I wrote the words on paper as I recited them, dragging the line of text between opposite walls, carrying it through the air on a page of my notebook. I held the open notebook horizontally […]
    • Musica Practica at Tate Britain January 5, 2011
      Speaking of that Kaprow statement, my ongoing work Musica Practica is programmed for Tate Britain’s Late at Tate event in February. Moving the performance into a museum makes a change from its original South Bank location, where it took place both outdoors and outside of a designated art space. It meant people stumbled upon the […]
    • Allan Kaprow – Art as Life January 4, 2011
      “I’m put off by museums in general; they reek of a holy death which offends my sense of reality. … Moreover, apart from my personal view, most advanced art of the last half-dozen years is, in my view, inappropriate for Museum display. … Museums do more than isolate such work from life, they subtly sanctify […]
    • Hints & Tips Poster #6 December 18, 2010
    • A LINE IS A LINE FOR ALL THAT December 10, 2010
      Andrew Graham-Dixon: Tell me why this is a drawing.  Why is it a drawing and not a text? Lawrence Weiner: Oh, using text for drawing is no problem.  It tells you something.  But drawing is explicit.  Drawing is not implicit; there’s nothing hidden in a drawing.  When you draw for people, you’re drawing something to […]
    • As you work they leave December 6, 2010
      Other people in three studios: “‘You know,’ Cage reportedly said, ‘when you enter your studio, everyone is there, the people in your life, other artists, the old masters, everyone. And as you work they leave, one by one. And if it is a really good working day, well, you leave too.'” (Robert Storr, pp. 59-60) […]
    • Reviews and Tights December 1, 2010
      I’ve just spotted online the Jolly (Good) Show review I wrote for a-n. It opens: “People don’t like it when you get your shoes lost under the desk and you slope around the office in your tights. It’s not professional.” It occurs to me this is the second review I’ve written involving tights. The other […]
    • Shoes December 1, 2010
      I like this a great deal. (shoe by Tag Savage)
  • Advertisements

Projecting Space at the Central Saint Martin’s MA Show

As an artist a lot of my work involves video in one form or another, but the disjuncture between the space of the video and the space of the room it’s in never really satisfies me. And so it might be to bridge the gap between the stuff of the artwork and the stuff of the world that I’ve started to work more with moving and static objects.

Walking around the MA show at Central Saint Martin’s the other week made me wonder whether there’s a trend in this direction. This year’s work struck me as being characterised by both a sculptural attachment to stuff and by a reluctance to leave projected and/or moving images uninterrupted. More often than not, the two tendencies reciprocated one another, with film, video and even still images presented as just one element of room-sized installations.

I’m going to put a stack of images together as some kind of John Berger-esque visual essay because I think they do a good job of speaking for themselves. The artists are, from top to bottom: Francesca Galeazzi, Paula Naughton (twice), Siobhan McAuley and Manuel Furtado dos Santos.

Francesca Galeazzi

Paula Naughton

Paula Naughton

Siobhan McAuley

Manuel Furtando dos Santos

The artists variously set out to ‘challenge common assumptions about the dynamics between physical and interior spaces, between tangible environments and ephemeral perceptions, between parallel worlds which at times are both real and imagined […]’ (Francesca Galeazzi), and to ‘create a conflict which plays on the friction between memory and reality, the perception between the past and the present, and the object and the photograph’ (Paula Naughton). The friction between the mediums is ostensibly the crux of the work, but as far as I can make out, the material’s status as artwork is never questioned, and in the context of the MA show this is the bit that interests me the most.

It seems to me that the imagined world of the artwork itself is under fire in these works, as their elements negotiate one another in a kind of struggle for supremacy, or at least an uneasy jostle for definition. There’s a dissatisfaction with the potential of either medium, so that video’s only good if it can spill into the room and the room’s only fit for purpose if there’s something unsettled about it – something that shifts spaces.

It’s a tentative kind of practice that interrupts itself – that intervenes even into the physical substance of itself – and I think this tendency to problematize the argument before it’s even quite in sight comes up a lot among the new generation of artists. We’re reluctant to define things or write manifestos or draw good thick lines, and there’s a lot of space for this kind of shuffling in the unsettled medium of the moving image – because we shouldn’t forget how new a medium it remains, and how much unexplored space there is at its edges.

Tamarin Norwood


2 Responses

  1. Further to what you say about the recent reluctance to write manifestos and draw lines: I see this as part of an interesting progression – from classic visual artists, who historically were never really asked to conceptualise their work, through the 20th century when the production of manifestos went into overdrive, to the uncertain now.. And I believe (or hope, or wish) that this is due to a realisation that here is one of the few areas of uncertainty avaiable to those who know nothing about quantum physics – but possessed of self-awareness of its own conceit that New-Age anti-science lacks.

    And that uncertainty is vital and fascinating.


  2. An interesting progression, definitely, and one that maps neatly onto the classical-modernist-postmodernist triptych. In which case, if you read postmodernism as a broadly positive cultural constellation, contemporary artistic uncertainty may indeed be vital and fascinating; alternatively, if you cast postmodernism as the bad guy, it’s an abdication of real [political] responsibility in the face of a catastrophic eternal present. Interestingly, the latter position is taken both by ‘progressives’ and ‘reactionaries’, pitting, say, the self-proclaimed Stuckists against some radical left-wing manifesto-writing arts collective (that must exist somewhere, surely). Or, if you’d rather, pitting the Daily Mail, the Daily Express and the Sun against Badiou, Eagleton, Jameson and Zizek.

    For my part, I would certainly side with uncertainty against hubris. Reading the Futurists now, aside from their objectionable politics and misogyny, what’s most disturbing is their absurdly inflated sense of self-importance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: