• RSS Recent Homologue posts

    • This site is no longer updated February 8, 2011
      This site is no longer updated. All existing and future homologue posts can be found at http://www.tamarinnorwood.co.uk/blog/ Advertisements
    • The body of the text #1 January 13, 2011
      We say: the writing of a text is its dying song.
    • The Third Bird January 9, 2011
      Here I am telling poems at the Icelandic Embassy. You can’t tell from the sound, but there’s a section where I wrote the words on paper as I recited them, dragging the line of text between opposite walls, carrying it through the air on a page of my notebook. I held the open notebook horizontally […]
    • Musica Practica at Tate Britain January 5, 2011
      Speaking of that Kaprow statement, my ongoing work Musica Practica is programmed for Tate Britain’s Late at Tate event in February. Moving the performance into a museum makes a change from its original South Bank location, where it took place both outdoors and outside of a designated art space. It meant people stumbled upon the […]
    • Allan Kaprow – Art as Life January 4, 2011
      “I’m put off by museums in general; they reek of a holy death which offends my sense of reality. … Moreover, apart from my personal view, most advanced art of the last half-dozen years is, in my view, inappropriate for Museum display. … Museums do more than isolate such work from life, they subtly sanctify […]
    • Hints & Tips Poster #6 December 18, 2010
    • A LINE IS A LINE FOR ALL THAT December 10, 2010
      Andrew Graham-Dixon: Tell me why this is a drawing.  Why is it a drawing and not a text? Lawrence Weiner: Oh, using text for drawing is no problem.  It tells you something.  But drawing is explicit.  Drawing is not implicit; there’s nothing hidden in a drawing.  When you draw for people, you’re drawing something to […]
    • As you work they leave December 6, 2010
      Other people in three studios: “‘You know,’ Cage reportedly said, ‘when you enter your studio, everyone is there, the people in your life, other artists, the old masters, everyone. And as you work they leave, one by one. And if it is a really good working day, well, you leave too.'” (Robert Storr, pp. 59-60) […]
    • Reviews and Tights December 1, 2010
      I’ve just spotted online the Jolly (Good) Show review I wrote for a-n. It opens: “People don’t like it when you get your shoes lost under the desk and you slope around the office in your tights. It’s not professional.” It occurs to me this is the second review I’ve written involving tights. The other […]
    • Shoes December 1, 2010
      I like this a great deal. (shoe by Tag Savage)
  • Advertisements

Having trouble with durational film and video work

We still don’t know how to present moving image artwork, but it’s not for want of trying. Almost a year ago I went to a memorably poor tank.tv screening at the Tate Modern called I Am Future Melancholic. I’ve just found the notes I made at the time, and scribbled in pencil on the programme are the words “extremely very bad” with a cross full-stop. Among other less favourable things, it raised an important question: what are we supposed to do with ‘durational’ moving image work – lengthy or looped film and video normally intended to be installed in a gallery-type environment? It was hard work sitting through the dazzling strobe effects of John Latham’s Speak (1962) and Vito Acconci’s Breakthrough (1970), robust and significant films in their time but which felt tacked on to the end of the programme in a way that was utterly unsympathetic to the needs of the works and, accordingly, the needs of the viewers for whom the screening had become a bit of an endurance test.

Mouth That Roars 1

Last night I went to see Grad Fab, a one-night screening of video art by selected 2007 BA and MA graduates from the UK. The technical standard of work was very high and it was a treat to see such a variety of work in one sitting. It was a shame it only lasted one evening as it gave the event a private view atmosphere, in which some of the videos – and visibly, some of the audience – suffered from the auditorium/show-reel format. Otherwise memorable and eloquent works (Sara Bjarland, Tersha Willis…) were compromised by their length, a quality that in a more thoughtful setting would have allowed for a slow, cumulative contemplation through which the videos might have genuinely enacted the quiet power they merely described last night. As a private view it felt like the artwork was getting in the way a bit, as though we would have preferred wallpaper or background music (but isn’t it always the way with private views?).

Since the advent of the moving image no end of things have been written and said and done about the difficult relationship between the viewer and the film/video, and the ‘arts of sound’ have more recently begun to receive similar attention. Just as with audio work, it’s hard to physically accommodate moving image work without marginalizing it. There needs to be a middle-ground between the irksome show-reel format on the one hand, and on the other hand the traditional ‘static’ gallery setting that allows visitors to come and go as they please but which risks isolating time-based artwork by putting it in a room of its own, even regulated by a start-time schedule after which doors are closed and the ‘play’ button is pressed.

Mouth That Roars 2

Every now and then you see a thoughtful strategy for balancing the habits of the viewer and the needs of the artwork. For me one such initiative sprang up last night. The Grad Fab event was run by The Video Art Gallery and held at MTR Studio 23, where they have an innovative approach to viewing moving image work. They hire out the big screen to external organisers (Video Art Gallery in this case) and for the rest of the time they’re a video cafe. You go in, buy a coffee, pick an art-house video and watch it from one of the seats clustered around the little video screens dotted throughout the shop. And for the Grad Fab night these small screens were divided between the eleven exhibiting artists, and small versions of their work looped quietly amongst the conversations and the wine glasses all night, with headphones hooked up for serious watchers, of which there were many. It did real justice to the works, facilitating lengthy, enduring consideration, even if some of the time you were only aware of what was going on out of the corner of your eye. And in the social context of the event, the head-height screens entered into a nice relationship with the groups of viewers sitting around, as though the videos were chatting away along with the rest of us.

Tamarin Norwood


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: